|
|
Alessio Cangiano , UNFPA
Elizabeth Wilkins, UNFPA
MIchael Herrmann, UNFPA
Andreas Backhaus, Federal Institute for Population Research (BiB)
Global population ageing, driven by declining fertility and increasing longevity, presents profound 21st-century policy challenges. Conventional measurement of this trend is dominated by the static Old-Age Dependency Ratio (OADR), which, by using a fixed chronological age (e.g., 65+), ignores concurrent, transformative improvements in population characteristics. This creates a potentially misleading narrative of dependency and risks flawed policy responses. This paper investigates how alternative, dynamic measures of ageing can provide a more accurate and nuanced basis for policy. It conducts a comparative analysis of four distinct measurement frameworks: traditional chronological measures, prospective measures incorporating longevity, economic measures based on the generational economy, and health-based measures. The analysis reveals that all indicators offer different but complementary perspectives. Prospective measures, for instance, suggest a slower pace of 'effective' ageing by indexing 'old age' to remaining life expectancy, while National Transfer Accounts provides a realistic measure of economic dependency based on actual production and consumption profiles. The main contribution of this paper to the literature is to propose a multi-indicator policy framework to inform adaptive policies on pensions, healthcare, and labour markets that reflect the evolving human capital of ageing populations across different economic and social contexts.
Presented in Session 6. Demographic Change and the Making of European Welfare Policy